Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | slatorade | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12772709 |
Mono Black Demons | kazutaka oya | 11-3 | None |
Dimir Midrange | jean-emmanuel depraz | 9-5 | None |
Esper Pixie | samuele estratti | 9-5 | None |
Dimir Midrange | antoine cointe | 9-5 | None |
Orzhov Sacrifice | istillarte12 | 8-6 | None |
Orzhov Pixie | conor hughes | 6-2 | None |
Esper Pixie | jari rentsch | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Control | oruç aslan | 6-2 | None |
Abzan Roots , Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Gruul Aggro
Nihil Spellbomb ranks #446 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 9%).
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Nihil Spellbomb is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 12.14 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Nihil Spellbomb has a win rate of 57.5%, making it 21.3% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nethergoyf | Creature — Lhurgoyf | 5 | 56.8% | 1 |
Collective Brutality | Sorcery | 5 | 56.8% | 1 |
Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 6 | 56.2% | 0 |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 8 | 55.7% | 1 |
Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 6 | 55.6% | 1 |
Dark Ritual | Instant | 5 | 55.4% | 1 |
Expedition Map | Artifact | 5 | 55.4% | 1 |
Damnation | Sorcery | 5 | 53.5% | 1 |
Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 12 | 53.2% | 1 |
Unearth | Sorcery | 5 | 52.5% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Nihil Spellbomb than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 1 | 5 | 78.9% | 61.6% | +17.4% |
Dark Ritual | Instant | 1 | 6 | 69.7% | 57.6% | +12.1% |
Defile | Instant | 1 | 6 | 73.5% | 62.6% | +10.9% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 16 | 65.4% | 56.7% | +8.7% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 5 | 63.6% | 55.0% | +8.6% |
Tarmogoyf | Creature — Lhurgoyf | 2 | 6 | 65.7% | 57.2% | +8.5% |
Gurmag Angler | Creature — Zombie Fish | 7 | 6 | 66.7% | 58.3% | +8.4% |
Preordain | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 65.2% | 57.2% | +8.0% |
Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 68.4% | 60.4% | +8.0% |
Springleaf Drum | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 65.0% | 57.4% | +7.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 23 | 1.2% | 39.6% |
Dimir Midrange | 14 | 0.6% | 40.9% |
Mono Black Demons | 11 | 5.8% | 60.6% |
Dimir Bounce | 11 | 2.1% | 31.7% |
Orzhov Pixie | 10 | 4.0% | 53.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.